A look at Jason Goodman’s bizarre lawsuit settlement e-mail messages.

22223333292031d66434d529b845

EDITORIAL AND OPINION

 

Jason Goodman, founder of the YouTube conspiracy show CrowdSource The Truth, is awaiting the filing of an Amended Complaint in the Southern District of New York.  The judge in that case has invited the Amended Complaint to be filed prior to September 11, 2019.  Jason wants this to go away apparently.

wwww3292031d66434d529b845

Jason Goodman

Please provide a current phone number as well as some times over the next few days during which you will be available for phone conference so that you and I may discuss a settlement of the one claim for which the judge has given you an opportunity to amend your complaint.  It is my hope we can avoid further involvement of the court in resolving this matter once and for all.

 

 

2222q031d66434d529b845

wwwqqqq031d66434d529b845

 

 

Defendant Goodman believes in the “one claim theory“.  In Goodman’s mind, there is only one opportunity to submit one copyright claim in the A.C.  Regrettably, this demonstrates the technical weakness of the defendant in understanding the litigation process.

 

 

coqqqqndddgs-justice

 

 

As the “one claim theory” is a neutralized non-starter the following reply was sent to the defendant.

 

 

cowwwddgs-justice

Hello,

I suggest you review the court filings in Richmond concerning defamation per se (as known in New York), known as trade libel in Virginia.
These pendent state defamation claims will be affixed to the amended complaint (AC).
You will need to file your response 20 days following the docketing of the AC.
Signed
Deep State Dunce
[corrected]

 

Defendant Goodman replies:

 

cowwssswddgs-justice.jpg

 

Jason Goodman

Please provide a current phone number and suggested times over the next few days for a phone conference.

 

Goodman is sent this reply:

 

co11111sswddgs-justice

Hello,   

Are you suggesting a settlement of $25,000 cash payment to resolve these issues?
If not, I am perfectly comfortable using e-mail vs. cordless phones that are vulnerable to man in the middle attacks.
Signed,
Deep State Dunce

MAN-IN-THE-MIDDLE ATTACKS

The e-mail reply above cites issues related to man-in-the-middle attacks on cordless phones, promoted by CrowdSource The Truth side kick David Charles Hawkins, (“forensic economist”).  As seen below, CrowdSource The Truth actively promotes the theories that man-in-the-middle attacks were used on cordless phones in the Jon Benet Ramsey murder and the intentional malfunction of New York Fire Department two-way public safety radios on September 11, 2019.
cstt-1-18-2019-hawkins-george-sweigert-phone-patent-2

https://trackingmeroz.wordpress.com/tag/george-h-sweigert/

519sssDL._SX333_BO1,204,203,200_
co12112222dgs-justice
Another Jason Goodman reply:

 

co122222swddgs-justice

 

Jason Goodman

I am asking you to provide a phone number for a telephone conference so we may discuss the remaining aspects of your complaint and work to arrive at a mutually agreeable settlement without further involving the courts.  This is my third request, and based on your failure to properly respond, you seem to be resisting cooperating with the request.  

I ask again, will you, or will you not provide a current phone number and work to establish a mutually agreeable time to conduct a phone conference to discuss these matters?  
Defendant Goodman received the following reply:
co1211qqaaddgs-justice

Sir,

Kindly forward any written proposal you care to make.
I will not subject myself to being recorded for your conspiracy YouTube show.
You appear not to understand the consequences of your actions.
The judge has invited an Amended Complaint (AC).  You may offer future settlement proposals in writing at any time, including after the AC is filed.
No phone number will be provided.  
If you are offering cash funds simply state your amount in numbers.
As you have labeled me:
Deep State Dunce

 

[corrected]

 

co1211wwwdgs-justice

L to R: Plaintiff in lawsuit, Manuel Chavez, III, Robert David Steele

 

Jason Goodman replies:

 

Jason Goodman

You may address me as Jason or Mr. Goodman.  I will not be providing any written proposal prior to a telephone conference to discuss numerous details related to your claims and the relief you seek.  Your presumption that any conversation would be the subject of a youtube broadcast is incorrect.  I am making a good faith effort to negotiate a reasonable settlement so we may avoid further involvement of the court and the associated expenses.  I believe your refusal to engage in good faith settlement negotiation at this stage will not be viewed in a favorable light in further proceedings.  I remain open to a conversation in which we might explore the realistic possibility of amicable settlement.  Please let me know when you will be available to do this.
Jason Goodman
323-744-75XX

[redacted]

 

The following reply was sent:

 

Hi,

These words sound shallow in light of your knight in shining armor graphic you widely distributed on Twitter last week.
Please see your tweet with my horse and suit of armor and the unauthorized portrait of me.  Screams bad faith.
I suggest that George Webb act as a third party umpire or referee in nonbinding arbitration.  George is really good at this sort of thing.
As a sign of good faith you can remove all video content with my portrait and/or likeness and legal name.  Thats a good first step.
I would also appreciate a free coffee cup for my RV.  Can you send four each?  That would be a sign of good faith.
Otherwise I feel the judge’s invitation should be honored and an A.C. should be filed prior to 9/11.
Thanks.
Deep State Dunce
[corrected]
knight---Unt6666itled

 

Jason Goodman replies:

Jason Goodman

How do you propose we proceed with George as the intermediary and why do you believe your own brother is an impartial third party?  He’s directly involved in all of this.

Goodman is sent this reply:

 

Sir,

Please note the use of #SirSweigert in the attached graphic.  I assumed you approved of that salutation.
We should wait on George.  Or maybe we could use his lawyer friend McDuff.  He is a real lawyer in Cobb Island, Maryland.
I may need a guardian ad litem to review your suggestions as I am a mental case according to your videos.  Maybe George could act as guardian.
I have to get back to editing the A.C.
My phone is losing battery power.
Deep State Dunce

 

Goodman replies:

 

Jason Goodman

Should I consider your written statements admissions of fact?

 

Goodman was sent this reply:

 

Sir,

You have made several videos implying that I have a mental disorder.  This is your content.
So, it would be a fact that you distributed dozens of videos implying such a condition.
Is this your concern?
The content of your videos?
Otherwise I don’t understand.
Deep State Dunce
[corrected]

 

 

 

 

To be continued …..

 

 

 

corp5555

 

Copyright 2019

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

One Comment Add yours

  1. Jason Goodman seems to be taking a tag line from attorney Biss with regard to phone call conferences. “You seem to be resisting cooperating with the request”. As I recall, Goodman was reluctant to discuss practical issues of Discovery with Biss on the phone.

    Any issues regarding settlement with Sweigert in the RICO lawsuit should be in writing to show good faith.

    Goodman has shown in past dealings with others that he makes it a practice to record all phone conversations for future use on CSTT. But perhaps he wants to record this most recent phone request as part of a Marcus Conte show, as well. These past uses of recorded phone calls show a history of bad intent on the part of Goodman, because he likes to set word traps for the unwary.

Leave a Reply to Jacquelyn Weaver Cancel reply