Jason “dick pick” Goodman ignores Magistrate Judge and files a jumble of irrelevancies in his slander, defamation and libel lawsuit

11wwwstitled

 

OPINION AND EDITORIAL

Jason Goodman — the “filmmaker” with a social media track record of bizarre emotional outbursts, warning the public that video content of him masturbating was in the wild, and non-stop smear campaigns — can now add ignoring a federal magistrate Judge to his infamous list of CrowdSource The Truth achievements.

After three (3) requests made before Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron for postponement of the 11/14/2019 deadline to respond to the Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (SAC), Goodman has finally responded.

Aaron-Lehrburger-Wang
Above:  Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron

Forgetting the wise words of Magistrate Aaron spoken at the 10/24/2019 pre-trial discovery conference —  “I think a motion to dismiss would frankly be a waste of time” and that his Honor was “highly skeptical” that such a motion to dismiss would be a success — nonetheless Jason “dick pick” Goodman proceeded ahead in an apparent headstrong manner to bring his “case” to the Court.

These defenses are so commingled and jumbled with irrelevancies and redundancies that it is quite impossible to separate them without redrafting the pleading.

Burnham v. Hornaday, 223 App. Div. 218 (N.Y. App. Div. 1928)

2019_33_age_of_conspiracy

MORE CONSPIRACIES

At the outset, Goodman continues spewing his version of the facts concerning George Webb Sweigert and Robert David Steele in the so-called Port of Charleston (S.C.) dirty bomb hoax of June 14, 2017 (which Goodman commented on in interviews with CNN and the New York Times with George Webb two days after the event).

Goodman spends several paragraphs exonerating himself for the Port of Charleston dirty bomb hoax and instead blames the Plaintiff, George Webb’s brother.

jason-goodman-slander-lawsuit-33

Then Goodman attempts to re-litigate the issues in the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia with several paragraphs devoted to the Plaintiff’s attempt to intervene in that lawsuit (3:17-cv-00601-MHL).

Most of the document (Motion to Dismiss) is punctuated with “it is the Defendant’s belief…“.  No evidence is provided.

jason-goodman-slander-lawsuit-3344

Then Goodman falls back to announcing (again) his high virtues as a new type of journalist,  a “crowd sourced” journalist.

jason-goodman-slander-lawsuit-334466

CROWDSOURCE THE TRUTH TIN FOIL HAT BUCH

Above: (l to r) Trish “the dish” Negron, George “cop a feel” Webb and Jason “dick pics” Goodman (courtesy of Bill Warner)

.

U33eeddfntitled

 

U.S. District Court
Southern District of New York (Foley Square)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:18-cv-08653-VEC-SDA

Sweigert v. Goodman
Assigned to: Judge Valerie E. Caproni
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron

Case in other court:  South Carolina, 2:18-cv-01633

Cause: 18:1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act

11/14/2019 103 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH COUNTERCLAIM & THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT, re: 88 Amended Complaint. Document filed by Jason Goodman.(sc) (Entered: 11/14/2019)
11/18/2019 104 FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES to Jason Goodman.Document filed by D George Sweigert.(sc) (Entered: 11/18/2019)
11/18/2019 105 MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS PURS. TO FED.R.CIV.P. 12(B)(6) re: 106 . Document filed by Jason Goodman. (sc) Modified on 11/19/2019 (sc). (Entered: 11/19/2019)
11/18/2019 106 NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS PURS. TO FED.R.CIV.P. 12(B)(6). Document filed by Jason Goodman.(sc) (Entered: 11/19/2019)

 

click below to read PDF documents

 

First-Set-of-Interrogatories-for-Jason-Goodman

 

Jason-goodman-slander-libel-defamation-lawsuit-in-sdny

JASON GOODMAN BELIEVES HE WAS TRICKED

3W72119s5BjWPGGUiZ9pqnZoj8JHYxCCp9dtn2QVdjgxNqeduKFXMhZfx8zJXYzGaAoebKAxMm719K5M9Q93UoquQT119VFJoz7ibMRhvDbTjA1sD1keLn

71Pidls0QWL999999

dowssssnload

ad_217388437

D5zH9SyxCKdBnJaFeHnL3svQi9ZN2XzXDbzH7Wc9qWuAwuN59DomRtE9WbDEVwrSaukqdGFVkAh7H2pPmEm2P64f17sS3esNLJb489hHqebPjPGmwDBL7BynDoYxtLrYntTybt

maxresdqqqqefault

To be continued…

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Copyright 2019

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

One Comment Add yours

  1. After reading the Motion for Dismissal, one would have thought that Goodman was the plaintiff and Sweigert was the defendant in this defamation lawsuit.

Leave a Reply