Devin Nunes’ RICO lawsuit against Fusion GPS tossed out — Steven Biss, esq. given 90 days to resubmit papers and warned of sanctions if those are screwed up




Attorney Steven S. Biss, esq. of Charlottesville, Virginia is a busy man.  He represents a number of clients that orbit the so-called conspiracy movement on the Internet.  Such as Robert David Steele, David Seaman, Timothy Holmseth, Trevor FitzGibbon, Ed Butowsky and Rep. Devin Nunes, Congressman from Fresno. California.

One of the adventures of Mr. Biss has been to represent Cong. Nunes in a civil racketeering lawsuit against Fusion GPS, LLC — supposedly the “opposition research” firm that had something to do with the “pee pee dossier” related to the Russian collusion story of 2016.  The “GPS” initialism is derived from “Global research, Political analysis, Strategic insight”.

From April 2016 through October 2016, the law firm Perkins Coie, on behalf of the Clinton campaign and the Democratic National Committee, retained Fusion GPS to continue opposition research on Trump.[28][29][30] In June 2016, Fusion GPS retained Christopher Steele, a private British corporate intelligence investigator and former MI-6 agent, to research any Russian connections to Trump. Steele produced a 35-page series of uncorroborated memos from June to December 2016, which became the document known as the Donald Trump–Russia dossier.[28][31] Fusion GPS provided Marc Elias, the lead election lawyer for Perkins Coie, with the resulting dossier and other research documents.[29][30]


U.S. District Court
Eastern District of Virginia – (Alexandria)

Nunes v. Fusion GPS, et al
Assigned to: District Judge Liam O’Grady
Referred to: Magistrate Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan
Demand: $9,900,000
Cause: 18:1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Date Filed: 09/04/2019
Jury Demand: Plaintiff
Nature of Suit: 470 Racketeer/Corrupt Organization
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Devin G. Nunes represented by Steven Scott Biss
300 West Main St
Ste 102
Charlottesville, VA 22903
Fax: 202-318-4098
02/21/2020 34 ORDER granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 28 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint; directing that 12 Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice; directing that the plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a second amended complaint if he can do so pursuant to Rule 11. Signed by District Judge Liam O’Grady on 2/21/2020. (aott) (Entered: 02/21/2020)



Above: Biss client Robert David Steele

To be continued…

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


Copyright 2020


Leave a Reply