OPINION AND EDITORIAL
In a surprise move, Red China’s favorite “Tokyo Rose” propagandist George Webb, Cobb Island, Maryland, advanced the theory that COVID-19 virus czar, Dr. Anthony Fauci, is making millions off a potential vaccine for the coronavirus.
Theories are circulating that the national state of emergency declared under Title 32 by the Oval Office may allow for the “fast-tracking” of vaccine approvals for those immunizations that are related to patents filed by Dr. Fauci with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (U.S.P.T.O.).
If true, the use of Dr. Fauci’s patents (in theory) in this alleged manner would be characterized as the negligent, reckless, wilful or fraudulent use (N.R.W.F.) of patented technology. The N.R.W.F. model was first promoted by the Cambridge-educated forensic economist known as David Charles Hawkins (South Surrey, White Rock, British Columbia, Canada).
David Charles Hawkins is also allegedly well-known for his so-called investigative reports into the “murder suicide” of Barry and Honey Sherman in Toronto in 2017.
Hawkins is recommending that the Sherman family follow civil procedures similar to those used by the Brown and Goldman families after O.J. Simpson was acquitted in a verdict announced on October 3, 1995 of the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, where Simpson was found responsible for both deaths where the families were awarded compensatory and punitive damages totalling $33.5 million ($51.1 million in 2017 dollars).
Hawkins also states that if he is given all or any of the $10 million reward offered by the family for his help in solving the Sherman murders, he will share the reward equally with Jason Goodman, founder of Crowd Source the Truth, as Jason appears to be the only investigative journalist with the technical ability to work with Hawkins on the ‘discovery’ of evidence during real time shows to analyze the cause of wrongful deaths in high value target or mass-casualty events.
In a small, limited study, the malaria drug hydroxychloroquine helped to speed the recovery of a small number of coronavirus patients who were mildly ill, doctors in China reported. The authors of the report said say more research is needed. https://t.co/Lu7VStxI3e
— The New York Times (@nytimes) April 1, 2020
THE FAUCI PATENTS: IS THIS NEGLIGENT, RECKLESS, WILLFUL OR FRAUDULENT USE?
Legal experts appear to be debating the N.R.W.F. issues orbiting the so-called “Fauci patents”.
Patents by Inventor Anthony S. Fauci
George Webb appears to believe that some of the patents issued to Dr. Fauci by the U.S.P.T.O. may be related to the production of a promising COVID-19 vaccine based on sulfate Hydroxychloroquine sulfate Chloroquine hydrochloride.
MURDER VICTIMS BARRY AND HONEY SHERMAN’S APOTEX, INC. MARKETS HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE
On March 28, 2020 the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (U.S.F.D.A.) approved the “emergency use” of Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients.eua-hydroxychloroquine-fs-patients-03-28-2020
APOTEX, INC. (company owned by the deceased Sherman couple of Toronto at the time of the 2017 murders).00888897_pil
Begin listening at 33:33 below
Why was Barry Sherman, founder of Apotex (Canada's only Hydroxychloroquine manufacturer) mysteriously MURDERED by strangling in his home, along with his wife???https://t.co/hRVYEqjohZ
— Patrick Howley (@HowleyReporter) May 26, 2020
BACKGROUND ON DAVID “SHERLOCK” HAWKINS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
To be continued…
FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use.