LIST_FlagfactsFeb15_Gallery

 

 

OPINION AND EDITORIAL

In a surprise move, Red China’s favorite “Tokyo Rose” propagandist George Webb, Cobb Island, Maryland, advanced the theory that COVID-19 virus czar, Dr. Anthony Fauci, is making millions off a potential vaccine for the coronavirus.

Theories are circulating that the national state of emergency declared under Title 32 by the Oval Office may allow for the “fast-tracking” of vaccine approvals for those immunizations that are related to patents filed by Dr. Fauci with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (U.S.P.T.O.).

Untijkjjjjjkgg7777gkkjjtled

If true, the use of Dr. Fauci’s patents (in theory) in this alleged manner would be characterized as the negligent, reckless, wilful or fraudulent use (N.R.W.F.) of patented technology.  The N.R.W.F. model was first  promoted by the Cambridge-educated forensic economist known as David Charles Hawkins (South Surrey, White Rock, British Columbia, Canada).

David Charles Hawkins is also allegedly well-known for his so-called investigative reports into the “murder suicide” of Barry and Honey Sherman in Toronto in 2017.

Untijkyyyjjjjjkgg7777gkkjjtled

Hawkins is recommending that the Sherman family follow civil procedures similar to those used by the Brown and Goldman families after O.J. Simpson was acquitted in a verdict announced on October 3, 1995 of the murder of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, where Simpson was found responsible for both deaths where the families were awarded compensatory and punitive damages totalling $33.5 million ($51.1 million in 2017 dollars).

Hawkins also states that if he is given all or any of the $10 million reward offered by the family for his help in solving the Sherman murders, he will share the reward equally with Jason Goodman, founder of Crowd Source the Truth, as Jason appears to be the only investigative journalist with the technical ability to work with Hawkins on the ‘discovery’ of evidence during real time shows to analyze the cause of wrongful deaths in high value target or mass-casualty events. 

 

 

 

 

THE FAUCI PATENTS: IS THIS NEGLIGENT, RECKLESS, WILLFUL OR FRAUDULENT USE?

Legal experts appear to be debating the N.R.W.F. issues orbiting the so-called “Fauci patents”.

Patents by Inventor Anthony S. Fauci

Patent number: 9896509
Abstract: Methods are provided for the treatment of a HIV infection.
Publication number: 20160333097
Abstract: Methods are provided for the treatment of a HIV infection.
Patent number: 9441041
Abstract: Methods are provided for the treatment of a HIV infection.
Publication number: 20160075786
Abstract: Methods are provided for the treatment of a HIV infection.
Publication number: 20090285815
Abstract: Nucleic acids encoding recombinant CD4-fusion proteins
Patent number: 7368114
Abstract: Novel recombinant polypeptides are disclosed herein that include a CD4 polypeptide
Six other patents, not listed for journalistic efficiency

George Webb appears to believe that some of the patents issued to Dr. Fauci by the U.S.P.T.O. may be related to the production of a promising COVID-19 vaccine based on sulfate Hydroxychloroquine sulfate Chloroquine hydrochloride.

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04303507

 

MURDER VICTIMS BARRY AND HONEY SHERMAN’S APOTEX, INC. MARKETS HYDROXYCHLOROQUINE

On March 28, 2020 the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (U.S.F.D.A.) approved the “emergency use” of Hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 patients.

eua-hydroxychloroquine-fs-patients-03-28-2020

 

APOTEX, INC. (company owned by the deceased Sherman couple of Toronto at the time of the 2017 murders).

00888897_pil

 

 

 

Begin listening at 33:33 below

 

 

BACKGROUND ON DAVID “SHERLOCK” HAWKINS OF BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA

 

DAVID CHARLES HAWKINS

 

 

To be continued…

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use.

Copyright 2020

Advertisements