2hhhh00

 

OPINION AND EDITORIAL

So-called “Hollywood film maker” Jason Goodman is always glad — it appears — to offer his side-kick Larry Klayman a place to cry bitter tears after a legal defeat.  This time it was Larry Klayman’s loss in the Eastern District of Virginia in a new lawsuit (dismissed) which copies Klayman’s decades old lawsuit against Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch.

Larry Klayman, almost 70 y.o., has a colorful history of suing his former business partner (Tom Fitton) supposedly after sexual allegation charges were made against “grandpa” Klayman.  Then there was that business of alleged “child abuse” between grandpa and his children in a very messy Ohio divorce.  Meanwhile, the District of Columbia Bar Association apparently has a pending ethics complaint against grandpa Klayman that insinuates more sexual misconduct.  Then there is the “vexatious litigant” motions against grandpa in the District of Columbia federal courts.

Unthhh111itled

Above:  “Grandpa” Larry Klayman (l) interviewed by alleged homosexual Jason Goodman (r)

Above:  Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch

Above:  Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch

 

MISERY IN THE VIRGINIA COURTS FOR “GRANDPA” KLAYMAN

 

Larry Klayman filed a so-called duplicative lawsuit in Virginia that mimicked the decades old lawsuit Klayman has with Tom Fitton.  This tactic is known in legal circles as “forum shopping”, looking for new jurisdictions to file lawsuits rejected elsewhere.

Although the Virginia lawsuit was dismissed 4/28/2020, grandpa Klayman has filed a series of “reconsideration” motions to prolong the death of the Virginia case.

04/28/2020 21 ORDER- For these reasons, this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over this non-resident defendant. Accordingly, defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. 4] is GRANTED, and is it hereby ORDERED that this civil action be and is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema on 4/28/2020. (See order for further details). (acha, ) Copy sent as directed in the order. (Entered: 04/28/2020)

04/28/2020 22 RULE 58 JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the Defendant, Thomas J. Fitton and against plaintiff, Larry Klayman. Signed by Clerk on 4/28/2020. (acha, )Copy sent as directed in the order. (Entered: 04/28/2020)

05/05/2020 23 MOTION for Reconsideration re 21 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, by Larry Klayman. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit 3)(rban, ) (Entered: 05/05/2020)

05/19/2020 24 Memorandum in Opposition re 23 MOTION for Reconsideration re 21 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, filed by Thomas J. Fitton. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Driscoll, Richard) (Entered: 05/19/2020)

 

klay=3

 

189110--email436480

 

klayman--

 

MORE BACKGROUND

 

LARRY KLAYMAN, ESQ.

 

MOOT COURT PROCESS

 

Jason Goodman sidekick Larry Klayman, esq. defeated in attempt to disqualify presiding judge after 13 years in litigation against Judicial Watch

 

New twist in Arizona as Larry Klayman, esq., linked with Sheriff Joe Arpaio. 32 cases of child molesting not investigated.

 

Another Jason Goodman side-kick in hot water with the courts — this time so-called attorney Larry Klayman and his “knock off” Sheriff Joe Arpaio lawsuit in D.C.

 

Another motion to disqualify a federal judge by Larry Klayman DENIED in second federal case.

 

 

Untitlhhhed

Above:  Alleged homosexual Jason Goodman

port-of-bbbyy777g30636712292

To be continued….

 

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of criminal justice, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

Copyright 2020

 

 

Advertisements